Proving the Financial Soundness of Investments in Energy Use Reduction

Reducing energy use in buildings often requires an investment of capital, making an obligation of some sort, or both. As with any investment, there needs to be an acceptable financial return.

Returns are usually quantified in dollars saved. When looked at strictly from a dollars point of view, the investment can be looked at like other investments. The investment might even be compared to alternatives such as repaving a parking lot, expanding a workout area, or hiring more staff. Except it should be easier to quantify the return on the investment in energy reduction. Energy consumption can be easily measured. Things like parking lot improvements and staff may be desirable, but the returns are largely guesswork.

Payback Period

One of the easiest ways to quantify energy reduction return expectations is by estimating a simple payback period. Divide the expected annual savings by the initial cost.  If an expected simple payback period is really long, like 15 or 20 years, that investment can be quickly eliminated from contention without spending any more time on it.  There are probably  alternatives out there that will get a much faster payback.

Limitations to payback period as an investment metric include not quantifying changes in maintenance costs, which are not part of the initial investment. Also not accounted, but very significant are the returns that accrue after the payback period ends.  The time value of money is not accounted for.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCF)

Discounted cash flow accounts for the time value of money, and is therefore a metric that can be used if the quick-and-easy payback period metric passes muster.  DCF provides a closer look at the attractiveness of the investment opportunity.

DCF requires using a discount rate.  Different discount rates  make large impacts on the results of the analysis.  Therefore, it’s important to use one that is realistic, and even more important, to be consistent in using the same discount rate for all DCF analyses. 

Net Present Value (NPV)

Net Present Value also accounts for the time value of money, as  DCF is used to determine NPV.    Calculating the NPV results in either a positive number or a negative number.  A positive result usually indicates that an investment is worth doing.

Where NPV is less clear is when two different investment alternatives end up with positive NPVs.  The larger NPV is usually the best.  However, if more initial capital is required to reach that higher NPV, and that capital requirement comes at the expense of other things, such as necessary maintenance, then the answer is not so clear cut.

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

The internal rate of return is another useful metric.  It shows the discount rate where the NPV of cash flows = zero (assuming NPV is positive).   The IRR is useful for determining if an investment is worthwhile.   If the IRR is higher than the cost of capital, and there is confidence in the assumptions made to determine the IRR, then the investment is probably worthwhile.

Valuation Effects

Another consideration for energy cost reduction is how the reduction in costs effects valuation.  A change to energy assets that creates a lasting and meaningful energy cost reduction most definitely will increase the value of the property or business.  Of course, to be true, the scale of energy use reduction must have a material affect on the cost structure. 

More details about the subject of how energy costs cuts affect valuation is available in this blog post.

Other Financial Considerations

In the world of energy efficiency, there are often additional factors to consider.  Some of these factors include:

  • No money down loans
  • Low interest loans
  • Energy services agreements (ESAs)
  • Tax credits
  • Tax deductions
  • Accelerated depreciation
  • Grants
  • Discounted fuel
  • Discounted power
  • Tradeable credits, and more.

CIMI Energy Can Help

CIMI Energy can perform these financial analyses and write up reports that help you to prioritize where to focus.  

Beyond the financial aspects of these investments, there are  environmental and sustainability considerations. CIMI Energy can help with this also.  If so desired, these considerations can be considered within the reports. 

Identifying Opportunities for Energy Savings

Energy is used in many ways, from heating to cooling to power and motion.  Opportunities to lower energy use are available in all of these areas.  The challenge is to identify the best areas for reducing energy consumption by balancing opportunities with their costs.  It’s possible to find a positive net present value (NPV) for many different upgrades.

Energy Audits

For many building owners and managers, an energy audit is a worthwhile first step.  Often there are some glaring opportunities that easily apparent.  Old technologies that use lots of energy are an example.  Energy audits can provide a list of items where deficiencies exist, which can be prioritized and addressed by order of value.

Technical Fixes

The low-hanging fruit for energy reduction efforts is through the application of technical fixes.  In new-builds as well as in retrofit situations, older technologies are being supplanted by new.   Many leading industrial companies such as 3M, GM, and Volvo Group have made great efforts to reduce their use of energy in their processes.  For example, Volvo Group announced in May 2018 that they have successfully reduced their energy consumption by 25% at their US facilities!  As a company in an energy-intensive business, Volvo Group’s savings is impressive, and impactful.  Reducing costs, lowering environmental impacts, and increasing competitiveness and investor returns are all resulting benefits.

Technical fixes are also available for other large energy users such as multifamily buildings, hospitals, and hotels.  Larger organizations may have in-house expertise, or work with management companies that dedicate staff to energy reduction efforts.  Smaller and medium size organizations in these business areas also stand to benefit from significant cost savings, and a corresponding increase in profitability.

Operational Fixes

As noted in the article at the Volvo link (above), that company is going beyond technical fixes:  “As we shift from technical changes — which tend to have a large one-time impact — to operational and behavioral changes that are more people-driven” the company’s objectives are to continue to reduce energy consumption. 

Companies like Volvo Group are showing great leadership in their commitment to, and success in  reducing energy consumption.  The behavioral and operational changes are a frontier that is ahead for everyone, though for the time being, for most, it is the technical changes which will bear the quickest payback.